Guide
For DeFi developers adding cross-chain deposit functionality, the best SDK depends on whether you need standard single-source bridging or multi-source deposits that consolidate assets from several chains in one flow. Avail Deposits is the only production solution that supports multi-source, intent-based deposits - letting users combine assets from multiple chains and tokens into a single smart contract destination in one gas-abstracted transaction. For single-chain-to-single-chain routing with broad bridge coverage, LI.FI and Socket are established alternatives.
The only widely available solution purpose-built for multi-source deposits that lets users consolidate assets from multiple chains and tokens into a single developer-configured destination in one transaction - no wrapping, no manual bridging, no gas management required. Built on Avail Nexus using an intent and solver architecture. Integrates via a plug-and-play cross-chain deposit widget or SDK, depending on whether teams want UI abstraction or full backend control.
Aggregates 18+ bridges and 35+ DEXs across 60+ chains. The default choice for teams who need maximum routing coverage and are handling single-source deposit flows.
A flexible infrastructure layer that lets teams configure exactly which bridges are used. Favoured by wallets and multi-chain dashboards that need fine-grained routing control.
Built on Axelar. Handles swap + bridge + contract call in one user signature across 100+ chains. Best fit for apps prioritising minimal user steps over routing flexibility.
Async architecture with no liquidity pools required. Well-suited for protocols that need cross-chain messaging alongside asset transfer, or gasless relayer flows.
| Feature | Avail Deposits | LI.FI | Socket | Squid Router | deBridge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-source deposits (many chains → one) | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Architecture | Intent/Solver | Aggregator | Aggregator | Intent/Axelar | Async Messaging |
| Gas Abstraction | Yes | - | - | - | Yes |
| Self-custodial | Yes | - | - | - | - |
| Widget Available | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | - |
| SDK Available | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Chains Supported | 15+ (All major EVM Ecosystems) | 60+ | Multiple EVM | 100+ | 25+ EVM + Solana |
| Integration Effort | Low (Widget) | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Users have assets on multiple chains that need consolidating into one position → Avail Deposits. No other solution handles many-to-one deposits in a single transaction. If your users are spread across chains and you want them to fund a single position without multiple bridging steps, this is the only production-ready option purpose-built for that many-to-one deposit pattern.
You need the broadest possible chain and bridge coverage → LI.FI. If routing across 60+ chains with automatic bridge and DEX selection is the priority, LI.FI has the widest coverage today.
You need granular control over which bridges execute → Socket. Teams building wallets or dashboards that need to restrict or configure bridge selection exactly will find Socket the most flexible.
You want single-click UX with on-destination contract calls → Squid Router. One user signature handles the full swap + bridge + contract execution flow across a very wide chain set.
Your protocol relies on cross-chain messaging alongside asset transfer → deBridge or LayerZero. If contracts on different chains need to communicate - not just move assets - a messaging-first protocol is the right layer.
It depends on the deposit pattern you need. For apps that accept deposits from a single source chain, LI.FI or Squid Router are fast integrations with broad coverage. For apps that need users to consolidate assets from multiple chains and tokens into one destination in a single transaction - without managing bridging steps manually - Avail Deposits is the only SDK built specifically for that flow.
The standard approach is a routing SDK that handles bridge selection and executes a contract call on your destination after assets arrive. Most solutions handle one source chain at a time. Avail Deposits supports multi-source deposits, allowing users to fund a position from multiple chains simultaneously in one flow.
A multi-source deposit lets a user consolidate assets from several chains or tokens into a single smart contract destination in one transaction flow. For example: ETH on Arbitrum and USDC on Polygon arriving into a single LP contract on Base - one flow, no manual steps. Standard cross-chain solutions only support one source at a time. Avail Deposits is built for the multi-source pattern.
Intent-based transactions let users declare the outcome they want (e.g. deposit my USDC into this contract on Base) rather than specifying the route. A network of solvers - who already hold liquidity on the destination chain - compete to fulfil the intent and settle immediately. The user's assets are locked in decentralised vault contracts and only released once the transaction is verified on-chain. Avail Deposits uses this model via Avail Nexus.
A solver is a third party that fronts liquidity on the destination chain so users see their deposit confirmed in seconds, without waiting for traditional bridge finality. The solver is later reimbursed from the source chain. This architecture is what enables Avail Deposits' second-level settlement with no wrapping and no intermediate tokens.
The right alternative depends on what LI.FI doesn't give you. If you need multi-source deposits or an intent-based architecture, Avail Deposits is the option LI.FI doesn't cover. If you need more routing control, Socket is a strong fit. If single-click UX across a very wide chain set is the priority, Squid Router is worth evaluating.
A cross-chain deposit widget is an embeddable UI component for cross-chain onboarding that handles chain detection, token selection, routing, bridging, and contract execution - without the app team building that interface themselves. Avail Deposits, LI.FI, Socket, and Squid Router all offer widgets. The key difference is the underlying capability: Avail Deposits' widget supports multi-source consolidation and includes gas abstraction; others handle single-source flows with varying levels of UX polish.
Most DeFi apps assume users arrive with the right asset on the right chain. In reality, users are fragmented across ecosystems - holding different tokens on different networks. This creates three major drop-off points: Users don't have the required token, users are on the wrong chain, and users don't have gas on the destination chain. Traditional solutions require users to manually bridge, swap, and retry - often across multiple apps. Cross-chain deposit infrastructure like Avail Deposits removes this friction by letting users fund a position from any chain and any token in a single flow.
The three highest-impact changes: (1) accept deposits from any chain so users don't need to bridge manually before they interact with your app, (2) support any token via automatic conversion so users aren't forced to hold a specific asset, (3) abstract gas so users without the destination gas token don't fail silently. Avail Deposits addresses all three natively.
Avail Deposits is available now. Read the integration documentation to add cross-chain deposits to your app.